Greetings, my fellow port swillers!
My post below touching on the Star Trek movie I happened to have chosen to watch the evening I unexpectedly met Mrs. Robbo generated a fair bit of “wow, how did you dodge that bullet” commentary with respect to my choice, so I thought I would follow up with a completely gratuitous post summarizing my opinion of the franchise as a whole.
Mind you, I am NOT a “Trekkie”. Yes, along with many others of my age, in my misspent yoot I spent a lot of weekday afternoons watching and loving reruns of the original series. Yes, certain words and phrases from the series have made it into the Robbo lexicon. Yes, I built a model or two of the Enterprise. (For what it’s worth, I also had models of the Galactica, a Colonial Viper, an X-Wing and a TIE-Fighter. I also built 1/48 scale models of most of the Allied fighters and bombers of WWII and hung them from my bedroom ceiling.) Yes, I was excited that the teevee series made it on to the big screen. And yes, I know all about the Kobayashi Maru test.
But that’s it. Totes serially. I never owned a costume. I never sought an autograph. I never went to a convention. I have never owned a “Star Fleet Academy” rear-window decal. I never sought to learn how to speak Klingon. And I never, ever, believed that the United Federation of Planets was any kind of political model for the real world.
I’m normal. NORMAL, I tell you!
Which is all to say that the following rankings are both completely subjective and probably shallow and ill-informed as well. I don’t care.
Anyhoo, here we go:
The Original Series Movies
1st – Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan. A no-brainer, amirite? A perfectly balanced film bringing out all the TOS tropes while also encapsulating the glories of space travel (the scene where the Enterprise leaves space dock always chokes me up) and setting up a classic submarine chess match between Kirk and Khan. I like this film so much that I don’t even snicker at Scotty’s rendition of “Amazing Grace” on the pipes toward the end. Without looking it up, I believe that even the late Prog New Yorker film critic Pauline Kael described it as “wonderful, dumb fun”.
2nd (tie) – Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home and Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country. Two very different films with two very different sets of strengths and weaknesses which balance each other out in my mind. ST4-TVH has a lot of anti-Reagan platitudes and hippy-dippy nature cant, but it holds up in terms of the chemistry among the main characters. ST6-TUC would have been a much better film, but it spends too much time in dry, tedious Sherlock Holmes-like questing for clues surrounding its central mystery. (I say nothing of the fact that its main theme musick was a complete rip-off of “Mars, the Bringer of War” from Gustov Holst’s The Planets.)
4th (tie) – Star Trek III: The Search for Spock and Star Trek V: The Final Frontier. Two films that, in my mind at least, shared the same fatal flaw in that both were so arch about themselves and the Universe they portrayed as to cross the border into camp. The plot of STIII-SFS was reasonably sound and could have been done quite well, but was squandered in its execution – the whole disabling of the Excelsior, for example. STV-TFF, on the other hand, while also carrying a not-unreasonable plot, was just….well, bad all around.
6th – Star Trek: The Motion Picture. Yep, sucked. By golly, unless you weren’t there yourself, you don’t know the disappointment felt by a 14 y.o. boy of my previous Trek experience when this dog of a film hit the big screen, Bald Babe notwithstanding. Personally, I blame Jimmy Carter.
The Next Generation Movies
Before getting to the films, I will say that I hated the first season or two of ST:TNG on teevee because it bent all over itself to show how politically correct it was: Psychiatric counselor (in homespun body suit) on the bridge; Model U.N. -type captain; nary a shot fired in anger; constant apologies for Mankind’s perceived past transgressions against Mother Universe. However, after a while, the show seemed to calm down and turn its attention to teh stars out there instead of gazing at its own navel. (Well, okay, there was a good bit of the multiple personalities of Data and the, ah, doings of Riker on the holideck, but you know what I mean.)
Anyhoo, I never cared as much about any of the TNG films as I did of teh TOS ones, probably because I never totally accepted the TNG premise. Nonetheless, here we go:
1st – Star Trek TNG: First Contact. I always thought the Borg, the ultimate sci-fi manifestation of Collective Progressivism, was the single greatest idea to come out of the minds of the TNG writers, however ironically. I also liked the film’s easy treatment of the personalities and relationships that had evolved among the TNG Enterprise’s crew over the prior teevee seasons. Instead of having to prove themselves, the characters seemed to be having fun.
2nd – Star Trek TNG: Generations. Weeeeell, it was okay, and I suppose a reasonably good hand-over, although I always laugh at the scene in which Kirk is cooking an omelet and directing Picard to fetch him various spices. What bothers me is TMW – Too Much Whoopie. (I could never stand her Guinan character.)
3rd (tie) – Star Trek TNG: Insurrection and Star Trek TNG: Nemesis. Whelp, I admit I don’t recall much of either film. One had to do with a planet of Enlightened Vegan, Free-Range Baby-boom Volvo Drivers. The other had to do with some kind of Evil Picard Clone doing Bad Things. Frankly, it was all pretty dull.
Reboot Movies
I gather that there are two: Star Trek and Stark Trek Into Darkness. I’ve seen neither and I spit on both. Want your own story? Write your own damned story!
9 comments
Comments feed for this article
January 31, 2015 at 6:15 am
Vicki
So basically you’re only 1/2 geek. Good to know.
As for me I never really watched the original program, although I know about such things as Tribbles and “Dammit, Jim!” I took my mother to the theater to see the movie where the Enterprise crew saves the whales (“Double dumbass on you!”). Mum loved the show and I was just being the dutiful daughter.
The reboots? Oh yes, I’ve seen them but I’ll admit here, now, always and forever that I only watched Into Darkness because of Cumberbatch.
I’m not a big sci fi fan but I love Who. Go figure.
January 31, 2015 at 9:24 am
quiltbabe
The first new movie is wonderful – Abrams hit exactly the right notes to pay homage to the original series while rebooting things *just* enough to give the franchise new life. The second one? Eh, I’ll echo Vicki here. The plot is rather…convoluted. Even so, I’ve seen it twice.
I know rather more than the average normal person about Star Trek, science fiction, Marvel and other universes and geek culture in general. Just enough to know what’s up, but not enough for Borg-like assimilation. I blame it on the fact that I have a group of friends all twenty years younger than me.
January 31, 2015 at 11:07 am
Robbo
Yes, I suppose I’m about 1/2 geek when it comes to Trek. Now when it comes to all things Tolkien, well, that’s a whole different level of crankiness. Short version of my opinion of the movie cycle: Peter Jackson is going to teh Special Hell.
February 2, 2015 at 1:50 pm
The Maximum Leader
Methinks thou might protest too much…
For what it is worth, I’m more of a Trek geek than you, but haven’t owned costume or sought autograph…
February 2, 2015 at 2:39 pm
nightfly
Poor Zack Quinto. Either he’s creepy and evil and everyone hates his character (American Psycho, Heroes, and now The Slap – and you’ve gotta be kiddinme with THAT codswollop)… or he’s trying to be Spock and nobody likes that either.
Fine actor, two would-be iconic roles (Sylar and Spock) and nobody can stand seeing him.
Meanwhile, Benedict Cumberbatch gets Sherlock Holmes and Khan Singh and pretty much crushes them both, gets Alan Turing, even plays that asshat Julian Assange – and everybody lurves him. What a business.
February 2, 2015 at 10:48 pm
Robbo
My dear Nightfly, I request and require your presence at dawn, weapons of your choice. In re Holmes, I can only allow Jeremy Brett to “crush” him on screen (with an Honorable Mention to Basil Rathbone). In re Khan, there is, of course, only Ricardo Mantalban.
I’m afraid these positions are non-negotiable.
February 3, 2015 at 6:30 am
captainned
And I will follow behind with the Rich Corinthian Leather in which to wrap the corpse.
February 3, 2015 at 10:30 am
nightfly
My esteemed and gracious host –
My example is only meant to highlight the difference in common opinion on the two actors in question. Cumberbatch is well-regarded as Mr. Holmes, and his Kahn was generally held to be the only tolerable part of that whole sorry middle-school production. I merely note that these opinions exist; I do not necessarily join my own to theirs. *
I beg you to recall that the discussion of to whom a role belongs has arisen prior, and ended in great amity. I’ve no wish to cause a commotion on this point. (‘Twould spill the beer.)
* My own opinion is that Cumberbatch is excellent as Holmes, but his Khan really isn’t Khan at all. It’s hard to buy him as a genetically-engineered Sikh, and JJ Abrams has that curious malady caused by watching too much television, where one thinks that British accent = cultured villain. Montalban for me as regards definitive portrayal. But if I must still answer for Holmes, then I choose the hockey sticks. I shall man my nets and you may fire at will, and afterward I’ll make the omelettes and coffee to order.
February 3, 2015 at 10:21 pm
Robbo
Omlettes and coffee…..mmmmmm……..